shafik added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/test/CXX/drs/dr23xx.cpp:202
+ // void g2(A a) { a.operator B decltype(B())::*(); }
+ // void h(A a) { a.operator identity<B>::type B::*(); }
+ // void h2(A a) { a.operator B identity<B>::type::*(); }
----------------
Endill wrote:
> shafik wrote:
> > While gcc accepts the first three it does not like the last two:
> > https://godbolt.org/z/js8Pz14Eo
> >
> > I believe they should also be covered but not confident.
> I agree they should. I can't find any special considerations in the standard
> regarding unqualified name lookup of template arguments.
>
> Are there any action items for me here?
Yeah, can you file a gcc bug report for the last two? If they agree it is a gcc
but then we are all good, if not then we need to see what they say.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D142316/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D142316
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
