umesh.kalappa0 added a comment. In D142872#4090317 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D142872#4090317>, @nikic wrote:
> You also shouldn't need to introduce any new handling for the fwrapv option. > I'm not sure how exactly it is currently threaded through, but there must be > existing handling for it already. For example, there is > isSignedOverflowDefined() on LangOptions. Make sense here . CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D142872/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D142872 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
