-Wmissing-prototype only warns for functions, I want to catch classes too. Also functions in the global namespace with a prototype are still badness in some coding styles. The limitation on definitions was to cut down on false positives, the current version of the patch doesn't have that limitation but I'm pondering on putting it back as there are too many false positives.
On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 5:34 PM, David Blaikie <dblai...@gmail.com> wrote: > This seems to have a lot of overlap with -Wmissing-prototype, really - what > do you think of the overlap/distinction between the two? > > On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 1:25 PM Eugene Zelenko via cfe-commits > <cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> Eugene.Zelenko added a subscriber: Eugene.Zelenko. >> Eugene.Zelenko added a comment. >> >> Please mention this check in docs/ReleaseNotes.rst (in alphabetical >> order). >> >> >> https://reviews.llvm.org/D23130 >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> cfe-commits mailing list >> cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org >> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
