rymiel added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang/lib/Format/UnwrappedLineParser.cpp:3592-3601 case tok::kw_bool: // bool is only allowed if it is directly followed by a paren for a cast: // concept C = bool(...); // and bool is the only type, all other types as cast must be inside a // cast to bool an thus are handled by the other cases. if (Tokens->peekNextToken()->isNot(tok::l_paren)) return; ---------------- rymiel wrote: > owenpan wrote: > > We should pass `true` to `peekNextToken()` on Line 3597 here, but removing > > this entire case would have no effect on the existing unit test (Line 23693 > > in FormatTest.cpp). @HazardyKnusperkeks any idea? > The peeking is there because of https://reviews.llvm.org/D134325, it has no > format tests, only an annotator test Also, I don't think that function is involved in concept declarations since https://reviews.llvm.org/D140339 Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D142412/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D142412 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits