owenpan added a comment. In D141654#4053551 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D141654#4053551>, @HazardyKnusperkeks wrote:
> In D141654#4053470 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D141654#4053470>, @rymiel wrote: > >> This also made me wonder, is there an actual policy on deprecated options? >> As in, when they are actually removed. Is there even prior precedent for >> doing this? (I wouldn't know because I'm a very recent user) > > I think the first one was D108752 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D108752> and the > documentation can handle that since D127578 > <https://reviews.llvm.org/D127578>. > Removing an option is not different than changing the type of an option, > users of `libformat` have to adapt, and users of `clang-format` don't notice > (if everything is done right), because the parsing for the removed options is > still there, see lines 1068 and following of `Format.cpp` in this change. +1. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D141654/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D141654 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
