vedgy added a comment. In D139774#4066519 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D139774#4066519>, @dblaikie wrote:
> (1) seems OK-ish, I guess there's some question as to what the tradeoff is > for that option - does that blow out memory usage of the client/kdevelop? But > I guess it's probably fine. At least one KDevelop user who has limited RAM and keeps /tmp on disk (not tmpfs) protested vehemently against unconditional storing of the temporary files in RAM. Several gigabytes of RAM can be valuable on some systems. Storing huge files in a temporary directory is definitely more flexible. But to users who keep /tmp on tmpfs, storing the preamble files in RAM is preferable, because memory is always freed right after a KDevelop crash, not on next start of the same KDevelop session (which can occur much later). Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D139774/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D139774 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
