h-vetinari added a comment. In D137534#4055283 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D137534#4055283>, @ChuanqiXu wrote:
> @h-vetinari said it should be OK to backport these patches to branched 16.x. That should be considered a comment from the peanut gallery, not a definite statement. What I had said in https://reviews.llvm.org/D137058 was: >> [...] but I am not sure if we can land them in time. I guess it may be >> possible to backport these patches to 16.x since it is relatively important? > > Might make sense tagging the release managers if things get tight - perhaps > it's possible. E.g. ranges for LLVM 15 was also finished after the branch. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D137534/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D137534 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
