aaron.ballman added a comment. In D133574#4052293 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D133574#4052293>, @efriedma wrote:
> Given the extension appears to have real-world usage, I don't see any reason > to break that usage. All known implementations parse this the way the user > expects, there isn't any chance the user meant to write something else, and > there isn't any chance it will mean something else in a future version of the > standard. I've reached out privately to some folks in GCC to find out whether they plan to define this behavior in their builtin or not. One response I've gotten so far is that they expect a type to be allowed to be defined in C but not in C++ (so `offsetof` has the usual expected behavior in each language). Because of the existing code and because of GCC, I'm leaning pretty strongly towards defining the behavior for C and issuing an extension warning. If anyone has a strong opinion to the contrary, please speak up! Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D133574/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D133574 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
