hokein added a comment. In D141608#4050739 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D141608#4050739>, @kadircet wrote:
> I am a little skeptical about this one. I think it's somewhat an obscure > pattern, and probably warrants a use of the type when it can be deduced and > the user code is accessing members (relying on the type more than an opaque > manner). So what about waiting on this patch until we encounter examples in > real world that require such a treatment? Sure, sounds good. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D141608/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D141608 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
