fpetrogalli marked an inline comment as done.
fpetrogalli added a comment.

In D137517#4045299 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D137517#4045299>, @jrtc27 wrote:

> In D137517#4042875 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D137517#4042875>, @fpetrogalli 
> wrote:
>
>> In D137517#4042758 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D137517#4042758>, @fpetrogalli 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> After submitting this, I had to revert it 
>>> <https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8bd65e535fb33bc48805bafed8217b16a853e158>
>>>  because of failures like 
>>> https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/225/builds/12367/steps/5/logs/stdio
>>
>> I have resubmitted with what I hope is the right fix (I could not reproduce 
>> any of the failures I was seeing in buildbot, on my machine the build is 
>> fine).
>>
>> The new commit is at 
>> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ac1ffd3caca12c254e0b8c847aa8ce8e51b6cfbf
>>  - in the commit message I have explained what I have changed WRT this 
>> original patch. I have added  the
>> tablegen target `RISCVTargetParserTableGen` in the `DEPENDS` list of 
>> `clangDriver` and `clangBasic`. This makes sure that the `.*inc` file with 
>> theist o the CPU is available even if `LLVMTargetParser` has not been built 
>> yet.
>
> But you didn't use the proper Differential Revision tag, so the diff here 
> didn't get updated to reflect the amended version committed :(

What should I have done? Add  the `Differential Revision: 
https://reviews.llvm.org/D137517` as the last line of the commit with the 
rework? I wasn't aware of this for reworks.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D137517/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D137517

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to