ymandel added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang/include/clang/Analysis/FlowSensitive/DataflowAnalysis.h:89 + ? DataflowAnalysisContext::Options{} + : llvm::Optional<DataflowAnalysisContext::Options>()}) {} ---------------- xazax.hun wrote: > If we already change this code, I think we can consider replacing this with > `std::optional` but feel free to ignore. > If we already change this code, I think we can consider replacing this with > `std::optional` but feel free to ignore. Thanks, I was actually wondering about that. I wasn't sure where llvm/clang was in terms of `std::optional` adoption. I'm happy to update. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D140703/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D140703 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits