skan added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/test/CodeGen/X86/avx512vlbw-reduceIntrin.c:115
+
+char test_mm_reduce_mul_epi8(__m128i __W){
+// CHECK-LABEL: @test_mm_reduce_mul_epi8(
----------------
skan wrote:
> char has different meaning on different platforms. Should we use "signed
> char" or "unsigned char" explicitly?
> char has different meaning on different platforms. Should we use "signed
> char" or "unsigned char" explicitly?
Sorry, I think you misuderstood. It's a question, not a request. I already saw
```
_mm_mask_set1_epi8 (__m128i __O, __mmask16 __M, char __A)
_mm_maskz_set1_epi8 (__mmask16 __M, char __A)
_mm256_mask_set1_epi8 (__m256i __O, __mmask32 __M, char __A)
_mm256_maskz_set1_epi8 (__mmask32 __M, char __A)
```
in this file, but I am not if using "char" is appropriate.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D140531/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D140531
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
