sammccall added a comment. Yeah, good call. Do you mind if I first use this as a trigger to start a thread about this style rule on discourse, though? I've been meaning to, it came up in a review recently.
I think there's a fair chance of changing the policy from "require static" to "allow either" or "require anon namespace", and having the issue "live" in clang-tidy might make for a more engaged discussion. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D140532/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D140532 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
