jmmartinez added a comment. In D140195#4001989 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D140195#4001989>, @aprantl wrote:
> How does this affect the generated DWARF? Have you tested that this does the > right thing in LLDB? It shouldn't affect the generated DWARF on LLVM's main branch. Currently, LLVM relies on the field size to know if a member is a bitfield or not. However, if we apply the patch https://reviews.llvm.org/D96334 , if the `DIFlagBitField` attribute is not added, the members won't be treated as bitfields. Unluckly, I wasn't able to test the combination of https://reviews.llvm.org/D96334 and this patch together. If you have some pointers about how to trigger a test job on "Green Dragon", or how to test lldb's objective-c tests on Linux I'd be happy to test. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D140195/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D140195 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
