dblaikie added inline comments.

================
Comment at: clang/include/clang/AST/TemplateUtils.h:19
+namespace clang {
+namespace TemplateUtils {
+/// Make a best-effort determination of whether the type T can be produced by
----------------
aprantl wrote:
> Michael137 wrote:
> > dblaikie wrote:
> > > aprantl wrote:
> > > > It looks like all the other namespaces in Clang are all lowercase?
> > > Yeah, +1 to the naming.
> > > 
> > > & maybe not introducing a new "utils" bucket - they can be a bit of a 
> > > dumping ground. Could this operation belong elsewhere/in some existing 
> > > type, or maybe doesn't need a namespace wrapper - could be a free 
> > > function in the `clang` namespace?)
> > I suppose this could just be a static function on `clang::TypePrinter`. We 
> > use it from `CGDebugInfo` already anyway so it wouldn't be an extra 
> > dependency. Wdyt? @aprantl @dblaikie 
> I don't have any strong opinions either way.
Sounds good to me.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D139985/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D139985

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to