NoQ added a comment. Congrats on the fantastic hack that nobody else noticed! I've a feeling we cannot add tests for that, because any test would quickly break if we change the hash, though demonstrating that we fixed the problem would still be cool (eg. take two unsupported expressions of different kind but same type, and show that they're no longer reported).
One more minor comment. ================ Comment at: lib/Analysis/CloneDetection.cpp:127 @@ +126,3 @@ + // Initialize the last bytes that are maybe not fully overwritten. + CollectedData.back() = 0; + ---------------- I think `resize()` zero-initializes the whole new data(?) ================ Comment at: lib/Analysis/CloneDetection.cpp:142 @@ +141,3 @@ + CODE; \ + ConstStmtVisitor<StmtDataCollector>::Visit##CLASS(S); \ + } ---------------- This is... Beautiful... o________o /Approves. https://reviews.llvm.org/D22514 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
