aaboud added a comment. > ISTM that the DWARF spec intended such thunks to be encoded as > `DW_AT_trampoline`. That seems more appropriate than relying on codegen > emitting a tailcall. This way the debugger can make the policy decision of > whether or not thunks should show up in the backtrace.
> > In any case, correctness must always trump all else. Reverting to green > should take precedence over a QoI bug like PR24235. I agree to the revert, though I am not sure about the new test, it looks too complected, especially the command line. I will let David decide on accepting that test or ask for improvement. Regards, Amjad https://reviews.llvm.org/D22900 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
