rsundahl added a comment. In D125195#3979478 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D125195#3979478>, @vitalybuka wrote:
> Is this still relevant? > If so, I would recommend to split ItaniumCXXABI from asan changes. I haven't proceeded with this because this would be ABI breaking. I intend to support the (I believe) wrong ARM64 array cookie implementation and add the poisoning and tests re-enabled separately. Thanks for your input @vitalybuka. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D125195/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D125195 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
