samitolvanen added a comment. In D138337#3972009 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D138337#3972009>, @pcc wrote:
> Can't this be implicit if LTO is being used? I would prefer to keep this behind a flag (similarly to `-mibt-seal`), so we can better control when and where the optimization enabled. For example, enabling this implicitly would currently break LTO+KCFI kernel builds as the kernel has global functions that are not address-taken in C code, but still end up being indirect called because their addresses were taken in assembly code that wasn't visible to LTO (e.g. arm64's `alternative_cb` mechanism). Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D138337/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D138337 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
