ABataev added inline comments.

================
Comment at: clang/lib/CodeGen/CGOpenMPRuntimeGPU.cpp:243
         if (!FD->getType()->isReferenceType()) {
-          assert(!VD->getType()->isVariablyModifiedType() &&
+          bool isVMT = VD->getType()->isVariablyModifiedType();
+          assert((!isVMT || (isVMT && !IsForCombinedParallelRegion)) &&
----------------
doru1004 wrote:
> doru1004 wrote:
> > ABataev wrote:
> > > Is it for pointers only? Or for other types too?
> > I am not sure about that distinction; it allows for the same types as 
> > before except that when the directive is not a combined parallel for 
> > directive it returns immediately because the variable will then have to be 
> > captured and shared.
> Correction: it allows for VMTs to pass through in cases in which you don't 
> use a combined parallel for directive.
`IsVMTTy`?


================
Comment at: clang/lib/CodeGen/CGOpenMPRuntimeGPU.cpp:243
         if (!FD->getType()->isReferenceType()) {
-          assert(!VD->getType()->isVariablyModifiedType() &&
+          bool isVMT = VD->getType()->isVariablyModifiedType();
+          assert((!isVMT || (isVMT && !IsForCombinedParallelRegion)) &&
----------------
ABataev wrote:
> doru1004 wrote:
> > doru1004 wrote:
> > > ABataev wrote:
> > > > Is it for pointers only? Or for other types too?
> > > I am not sure about that distinction; it allows for the same types as 
> > > before except that when the directive is not a combined parallel for 
> > > directive it returns immediately because the variable will then have to 
> > > be captured and shared.
> > Correction: it allows for VMTs to pass through in cases in which you don't 
> > use a combined parallel for directive.
> `IsVMTTy`?
How can it be captured by value? Why does it happen? My first question relates 
to the assertion you changed. I assume, it applies only to the pointers. 
Otherwise, please add more context how we can capture mariably modifiable type 
by value.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D138614/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D138614

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to