sammccall marked 3 inline comments as done.
sammccall added inline comments.


================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clangd/TidyFastChecks.py:41
+def read_old_fast(path):
+    text = subprocess.check_output(["cpp", "-P", "-FAST(C,T)=C", path])
+    for line in text.splitlines():
----------------
kadircet wrote:
> what does `-P` do? shouldn't the latter be `-DFAST`?
-P avoids emitting `# 0 /path/to/Sema.cpp` lines. Added comments

Fixed `-DFAST`, I must have somehow mangled this after running it!


================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clangd/TidyFastChecks.py:83
+    print(f"{decision} {check} {time}% <= {threshold}%", file=sys.stderr)
+    print(f"{decision}({check}, {time})")
+
----------------
kadircet wrote:
> i don't see the point in including delta in the output if we're also making 
> the decision here. is it mostly for debugging purposes? e.g. when updating 
> the list we get to see the difference?
Yes, that's exactly the reason. Can make it a comment instead if you like, but 
that makes ad-hoc analysis slightly harder.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D138491/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D138491

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to