cor3ntin accepted this revision.
cor3ntin added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
Beside the formatting nitpick this looks good
================
Comment at: clang/test/CodeGenCXX/cxx2b-static-subscript-operator.cpp:14
+ f.operator[](201, 202);
+ Functor{}[301, 302];
+}
----------------
I think this is missing a test like
`Functor::operator[](42, 42)` for completeness
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D138387/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D138387
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
