nridge added a comment. In D136594#3940482 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D136594#3940482>, @sammccall wrote:
> I think since LSP specifies an `operator` SemanticTokenType, we should use it > unless there's a *really* strong reason not to. My bad, I completely overlooked that LSP has a standard token type for this! (I think maybe because I assumed D119077 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D119077> would have used it had it existed.) In light of that, please disregard my comment about making operator a modifier. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D136594/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D136594 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
