aaron.ballman added a comment. In D124351#3940890 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D124351#3940890>, @cor3ntin wrote:
> In D124351#3940888 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D124351#3940888>, @aaron.ballman > wrote: > >> In D124351#3940786 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D124351#3940786>, @cor3ntin >> wrote: >> >>> Now that Kona is over, I'm hoping to get back to that in the coming weeks. >>> Rebasing will be... fun. >>> I want to make sure we are all okay making that a DR following WG21 >>> guidance, given that not making it a DR would have potentially large impact >>> on the PR. >>> Thanks! >> >> To me, it depends on how much existing code the DR breaks in practice. If we >> don't expect it to break a significant body of code (or if the code that >> breaks will be materially improved as a result of the required changes), >> then we should implement it as a DR as far back as we can go. > > We expect very little, if any, breakage Then I think we should approach it as a DR and we can react if we get further feedback. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D124351/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D124351 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
