akhuang added a comment. In D137872#3925723 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D137872#3925723>, @efriedma wrote:
> I'm not quite sure I understand what's happening here. Does this actually > avoid generating two copies of the function body if both the call operator > and the conversion are used? That was intended but missing; patch is now updated to make both the invoker and the call operator call the new function. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D137872/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D137872 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
