aaron.ballman added a comment. In D136811#3913759 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D136811#3913759>, @jkorous wrote:
> @aaron.ballman We'd like to start making progress on the implementation in > parallel to iterating on the documentation and this is our first patch: > https://reviews.llvm.org/D137346 > > Since we'll have about 4 people working full-time on this it isn't reasonable > to expect you to review all our patches. > My understanding is that you are interested mostly in the user model and the > general user interface. > We can organize reviews for most patches among ourselves (with any extra > feedback more than welcome!) and would reach out to you specifically with the > things that are likely to interest you and/or where a broader consensus is > desirable. > WDYT? I think it's reasonable to start making progress on the implementation; we might debate some of the finer points, but if you're fine with the risk of needing to update the implementation later, I'd say "go for it!". My biggest request is: please try to keep this document in sync with reality so that we don't introduce confusion to the reviews. Repository: rC Clang CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D136811/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D136811 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
