goldstein.w.n added a comment.

In D137181#3914245 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D137181#3914245>, @owenpan wrote:

> In D137181#3914083 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D137181#3914083>, @goldstein.w.n 
> wrote:
>
>> In D137181#3914066 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D137181#3914066>, @owenpan 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> @goldstein.w.n do you need to modify MacroCallReconstructor.cpp, Macros.h, 
>>> and MacroCallReconstructorTest.cpp? Leaving them out wouldn't break any 
>>> existing tests.
>>
>> Hi, sorry to go mia all day. We can't drop `PPLevel` from 
>> `MacroCallReconstructor` because we need it for the `createUnwrappedLine` 
>> MacroCallReconstructor.cpp:L66.
>
> Why would you need it for `createUnwrappedLine`? Can you add test cases for 
> the requirement? Removing all the changes to `MacroCallReconstructor` doesn't 
> fail any existing and new tests.

Okay fair enough. Dropped.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D137181/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D137181

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to