Arfrever added a comment. After reading this discussion, I need some clarification.
If there were the followining symlinks pointing to `clang`: `i386-pc-linux-gnu-clang`, `i486-pc-linux-gnu-clang`, `i586-pc-linux-gnu-clang`, `i686-pc-linux-gnu-clang`, `x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-clang`. Then do I assume correctly that: 1. `x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-clang -m32` would try to load `i386.cfg` 2. `i386-pc-linux-gnu-clang` would try to load `i386.cfg` 3. `i486-pc-linux-gnu-clang` would try to load `i486.cfg` 4. `i586-pc-linux-gnu-clang` would try to load `i586.cfg` 5. `i686-pc-linux-gnu-clang` would try to load `i686.cfg` ? In modern multilib `x86_64` systems, only `i686-pc-linux-gnu-clang` and `x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-clang` symlinks (from above list) are likely to exist, but discrepancy in behavior between `x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-clang -m32` and `i686-pc-linux-gnu-clang` will cause confusion of users... Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D134337/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D134337 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
