owenpan added a comment. In D137486#3909970 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D137486#3909970>, @rymiel wrote:
> Are both isCpp11AttributeSpecifier and isCppAttribute required? Not really, but I've kept `isCpp11AttributeSpecifier` for now as it might become handy if it needs to be called at other places when we add an option for breaking after C++ attributes. Otherwise, I will remove it in a separate patch. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D137486/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D137486 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
