zhouyizhou added a comment.
In D119493#3403458 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D119493#3403458>, @efriedma wrote:
>
Thank Eli for your comment and guidance and sorry to have carelessly neglected
your comment for 7 months!
> I'm not sure this is the right fix. If we were handling the pseudo-destructor
> correctly, I would expect the following to compile successfully:
>
> typedef bool Var;
> constexpr bool foobool() {
> return (bool().Var::~Var(), false);
> }
Yes, g++ can compile above code successfully, while we can't.
I am going to try to fix above (I am a beginner who eager to learn ;-)
Cheers
Zhouyi
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D119493/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D119493
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
