I was wondering if there is any objection to removing the 2-element minimum on the eachOf, anyOf and allOf matchers.
It is frustrating when playing with matchers to have to edit significant amounts of code to be able to temporarily go from 2 to 1 matcher inside an any- or allOf matcher. And overall it feels very "un-set-theory"-like. The change was made here: https://github.com/llvm-mirror/clang/commit/674e54c167eab0be7a54bca7082c07d2f1d0c8cc Thank you and apologies if I sent this to the wrong lists/people. --Zac
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
