ChuanqiXu added a comment. In D137058#3896999 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D137058#3896999>, @dblaikie wrote:
> @ben.boeckel maybe this'd be the place to discuss the motivation for this > feature (picking up from your comment here: > https://reviews.llvm.org/D134267#3892629 ) > > admittedly there is a flag for specifying the filename for Split DWARF too, > but it's not a terribly official thing (doesn't have a '-f', '-g', etc prefix) Although I agreed it would be better to wait for @ben.boeckel to answer the question, I still want to say "why we would offer something only if it is **terribly** bad". It looks like if it is normally bad, then we won't handle it and you need to workaround for it. I feel bad for the strategy. Why can't we give some small help to make their lives easier. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D137058/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D137058 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
