dblaikie accepted this revision.
dblaikie added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
Test case can be simplified a bit further:
template <typename> struct Struct1 {
enum { enumValue1 };
Struct1();
};
void function2() {
struct Struct3 {};
int i = Struct1<Struct3>::enumValue1;
}
void function3() {
struct Struct3 {};
int i = Struct1<Struct3>::enumValue1;
}
but otherwise I'm OK with this - I don't /fully/ understand it, but it sounds
plausible enough. (if you have time, I wouldn't mind hearing more about why
this requires local types (`Struct3`) and two similar functions to tickle the
issue)
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D137067/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D137067
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
