ldionne added a comment. In D136533#3892949 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D136533#3892949>, @ldionne wrote:
> 2. Shipping this change does mean that anyone building anything with a new > Clang and a not-yet-updated libc++ with a deployment target before 10.15 (or > whatever first version we shipped filesystem in) will fail. IMO that's kind > of annoying, but may be OK if we fix libc++ first. I guess the interesting question here would be: @thakis, is there a reason why you are using the SDK-provided libc++ but the tip-of-trunk Clang for building Chrome? (I feel like we've talked about this before but I don't remember). Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D136533/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D136533 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
