aaron.ballman added a comment.
In D134453#3872355 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D134453#3872355>, @dblaikie wrote:
> But yeah, not sure/open to perspectives.
>
> @aaron.ballman - member names V type names V both?
I think type names are really the only thing that will disambiguate the
expressions in some circumstances. Consider the case where there are two
unrelated classes both with the same member name (like `Person::name` and
`Vehicle::name`) -- having: `S<Shape{.obj = {.name = "foo"}}>` would still
leave the reader guessing as to what object is actually being created without
having to go chase the information down themselves.
That said, I am also curious to hear if @mizvekov has thoughts on this topic
because he's been doing excellent work on template readability.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D134453/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D134453
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
