tbaeder added a comment. In D135013#3871209 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D135013#3871209>, @aaron.ballman wrote:
> In D135013#3870894 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D135013#3870894>, @tbaeder wrote: > >> @aaron.ballman Do you maybe have a different reproducer or know more about >> the expected behavior of a `ImplicitValueInitExpr` for array and record >> types? > > So here's another reproducer with a record type: > https://godbolt.org/z/EhT4oqT3s and here's one with an array type: > https://godbolt.org/z/Pbncnq418 > > My understanding of `ImplicitValueInitExpr` is that it's used to represent > some of the "holes" in the middle of an array/record that need to implicit > get some values. They are //inside// a struct or array, but not of array or struct type, if I understand correctly. But I see what you're getting at, I guess this should basically go through `visitZeroInitializer()` (which is currently unused), which should be extended to handle structs and arrays. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D135013/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D135013 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
