hel-ableton added a comment.

Adding two inline comments.


================
Comment at: clang/unittests/Format/FormatTest.cpp:6599-6601
+  Style.AlignAfterOpenBracket = FormatStyle::BAS_AlwaysBreak;
+  Style.BinPackParameters = false;
+  Style.ContinuationIndentWidth = 2;
----------------
HazardyKnusperkeks wrote:
> Do you need this for the observed effect? From the description I don't see 
> that.
I think it's necessary for the test to work, otherwise the value would fall 
back to 4, I think? Would you prefer the test to be re-written with the default 
value, instead? 


================
Comment at: clang/unittests/Format/FormatTest.cpp:6603
+  Style.BreakBeforeBinaryOperators = FormatStyle::BOS_NonAssignment;
+  EXPECT_EQ(
+      "struct Derived {\n"
----------------
HazardyKnusperkeks wrote:
> Is the behavior different when the code is already formatted like you want 
> it? (It shouldn't.) Then you should use `verifyFormat()`.
Not sure I understand. Would you like the test to be re-written so that the 
code is already formatted like the result of the formatting? 


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D136154/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D136154

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to