ChuanqiXu added a comment. In D134267#3864368 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D134267#3864368>, @ruoso wrote:
> FWIW, having a differently named argument for output files and input files is > very important for tooling. > > In particular, in the case of remote execution, it makes a huge difference > being able to tell what are the inputs and outputs by looking at the > arguments alone, so I would like to make the case for an explicit output > argument. > > In fact, this is something I'll request on GCC as well, since it currently > uses the module mapper to figure out both the input and the output BMI files. Is this a consensus of SG15? CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D134267/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D134267 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
