rjmccall added a comment.

It's certainly possible that other targets will want to support multiple C++ 
ABIs in the future, but it's okay for us to design things around the situation 
we've got today.  A lot of these "ABIs" are just target-specific variants; if 
it simplifies code to just make ABI queries just be target queries instead of 
abstracting the target C++ ABI, and the resulting burden on targets with 
multiple supported ABIs is very small, that seems like an acceptable trade-off. 
 If things change and we get a lot of targets asking to support multiple ABIs, 
there's no reason we can't revisit this decision.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D85802/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D85802

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to