craig.topper added a comment. In D116735#3857705 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D116735#3857705>, @zixuan-wu wrote:
> In D116735#3429850 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D116735#3429850>, @craig.topper > wrote: > >> I'm seeing a regression on 401.bzip2 and possibly 471.astar. And I'm not >> seeing large improvements on 471.omnetpp or 483.xalancbmk. > > LGTM. But do you still get regression on spec? Or any improvements? I only have numbers from my downstream repo which has a bunch of other changes. For one of our CPUs, I'm now seeing improvements, and another looks neutral. So I think we should move forward this. If there are individual regressions we can work on fixing those by improving the backend or fixing cost models or whatever. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D116735/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D116735 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
