martong added a comment.

In D101526#3804623 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D101526#3804623>, @NoQ wrote:

> Hi, looks great! I found a couple of typos and the amount of changes in tests 
> is suspiciously low. And I want to make sure that the promise to change "arg" 
> -> "argument" isn't lost (but I'll be happy if it's addressed in a follow-up 
> patch).

Ok, I've changed "arg" to "argument" in the latest update, plus added new test 
cases. Thanks for the review!



================
Comment at: clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/StdLibraryFunctionsChecker.cpp:755
   Result += getArgDesc(ArgN);
-  Result += " should not be NULL";
+  Result += DK == Violation ? " should not be NULL" : " is not NULL";
   return Result.c_str();
----------------
NoQ wrote:
> I suspect this needs to be covered by tests.
Okay, I've added further tests for the "not-null" and the 
"buffer-size-constraint" cases.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D101526/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D101526

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to