thesamesam added a comment. In D129755#3853809 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D129755#3853809>, @aaronpuchert wrote:
> @aaron.ballman, would like some feedback on the release notes. Should I > additionally write something under "Potentially Breaking Changes", or is it > enough to mention this under "Improvements to Clang's diagnostics"? Though I > guess we could also add this later on if we get more complaints that this > breaks things. I think it's sufficient in "Improvements to Clang's diagnostics". We're not looking to document every externally observable change in "Potentially Breaking Changes", IMO. Thanks for asking. We could definitely shift it later if needed. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D129755/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D129755 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
