cjdb added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticCommonKinds.td:397 +def err_reserved_identifier_for_future_use : Error< + "%0 is a compiler-reserved identifier for a future feature">; } ---------------- erichkeane wrote: > I don't think we should diagnose this for individual identifiers, I don't > think this adds much value, and the identifier is already reserved for > implementation use. This implies we are going to diagnose ALL future > reserved things, which we have no intention of doing. The motivation for this error is to ensure that standard library implementations don't take this name (`__remove_cvref` and `__is_null_pointer` had to get names that weren't a 1:1 mapping to their library counterparts as a result). Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D135341/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D135341 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
