yaxunl added a comment. In D135305#3838435 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D135305#3838435>, @jhuber6 wrote:
> In D135305#3838412 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D135305#3838412>, @yaxunl wrote: > >> should we test with -ccc-print-phases instead? It is not clear what actions >> are produced by driver. > > Ah, realized you meant with phases. This is good enough for NVPTX as there is > no explicit `assembler` phase. LTO makes no difference for AMDGPU as it > already outputs bitcode. It is not clear whether the driver respects -foffload-lto when -fno-gpu-rdc is specified. -ccc-print-phases shows whether the driver generates bc or object. -ccc-print-bindings does not because it does not show the file types. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D135305/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D135305 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
