jhuber6 added a comment. In D135076#3831298 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D135076#3831298>, @MaskRay wrote:
> We really want these `--offload-*` users to stick with one canonical form, > not `-offload-*` in some places while `--offload-*` in other places. > > Another angle is that people find `-offload-*` working with a new clang may > try `-offload-*` on an old clang and get `-o ffload-*`. > > And `-offload-*` doesn't help misspelled options. This is fine, as long as users get more distinct feedback that `-offload-arch` isn't doing what they think it does. Normally we'd get some error and a helpful suggestion if the option is misspelled, but with `-o` options we don't get anything. My only qualm with the current state is that it's not obvious that `-offload-arch` is actually `-o ffload-arch` for most cases. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D135076/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D135076 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
