vsk added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D22593#490490, @silvas wrote:
> LGTM with some small wording nits. > > We may want to extend this to mention number modifier to `%m` (e.g. `%4m`). > Perhaps it is better to leave that to more advanced documentation -- your > experiments showed that even just 1 merge pool is quite scalable IIRC. Actually, I think this is the right place to document the numeric modifier to `%m`. LGTM with Sean's nits. https://reviews.llvm.org/D22593 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
