rnk added a comment. Nice! Mostly comment copy edits.
================ Comment at: clang/lib/CodeGen/MicrosoftCXXABI.cpp:4478-4480 // MSVC Windows on Arm64 considers a type not HFA if it is not an // aggregate according to the C++14 spec. This is not consistent with the // AAPCS64, but is defacto spec on that platform. ---------------- These comments seem stale. Are the checks below almost equivalent to C++14 isAggregate? In any case, they associate with the logic below, which is arm-specific. The arm check deserves some kind of comment to say that all aggregates are permitted to be HFAs for non-ARM platforms, which mostly affects vectorcall on x64/x86. ================ Comment at: clang/lib/CodeGen/MicrosoftCXXABI.cpp:4498 + // anything containing/derived from one is non-homogeneous. + // Instnead we could add another CXXABI entry point to query this property and + // have ABIInfo::isHomogeneousAggregate use that property. ---------------- typo Instnead ================ Comment at: clang/lib/CodeGen/MicrosoftCXXABI.cpp:4501-4503 + // base/field while not true of the outer struct (eg: if you have a base/field + // that has an non-trivial copy assignment/dtor/default ctor, then the outer + // struct's corresponding operation must be non-trivial. ---------------- There's an open parenthetical here, maybe just make it `. For example, if you have...` Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D134688/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D134688 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits