to268 added a comment.
Also i have found that we don't parse the compound literal with the `auto`
keyword correctly in `ParseExpr.cpp` between line 939 to 973 which is the
beginning of `Parser::ParseCastExpression(...)`
int test_cl = (int){12}; // Compound literal is detected
auto test_cl2 = (auto){12}; // Compound literal is not detected
I've haven't dig deeper yet but maybe it's because we are not including `auto`
when trying to guess if it's a compound literal due to the fact that `auto` is
a `storage-class-specifier`
================
Comment at: clang/test/Sema/c2x-auto.c:49
+ auto b = 9;
+ auto c = a + b;
+ }
----------------
shafik wrote:
> When I made the comment about the example from the proposal, this was what I
> was thinking about.
Do i need to treat shadowing when using `auto` as invalid?
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D133289/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D133289
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
