erichkeane accepted this revision.
erichkeane added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
This seems right to me, thanks!
I'm currently pushing to try to make our diagnostics 'check' lines more
readable... it doesn't gain a ton in this case, but more to try to push for
consistency.
================
Comment at: clang/test/CXX/drs/dr26xx.cpp:7
+struct foo {
+ constexpr foo() requires (!A && !B) = delete; // expected-note {{marked
deleted here}}
+ constexpr foo() requires (A || B) = delete;
----------------
================
Comment at: clang/test/CXX/drs/dr26xx.cpp:12
+void f() {
+ foo fooable; // expected-error {{call to deleted}}
+}
----------------
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D134145/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D134145
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
