tbaeder added inline comments.

================
Comment at: clang/lib/AST/Interp/Program.h:48
+    // here manually so they are properly freeing their resources.
+    for (auto It : Records)
+      It.second->~Record();
----------------
erichkeane wrote:
> I SUSPECT that by a reading of our rules here, we aren't allowed to use 
> `auto` here.  That said, I'm sure I don't want to have you spell out the 
> whole LHS.  
> 
> THOUGH the name "It" is a little misleading, as this is NOT an iterator, it 
> ends up being a std::pair or something I think... 
Would `RecordPair` be better?


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D134054/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D134054

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to